People ask me why I use the terms "Organized," "Disorganized"
and "Mixed" for describing criminals. The practice dates
to when I first began research into the mind of the killer. Then,
I noticed that the behavioralists were using psychological jargon
-- "psychopaths," "antisocial," "sociopath"
-- to describe basically the same person. These terms were very confusing
to me as well as to others in law enforcement.
At times, I couldn't help but shake my head at some of the descriptions
I heard. For example, one psychologist called Charles Manson a "psychopath."
Another psychologist described him as a "paranoid schizophrenic,"
which is a psychotic disorder.
I never felt qualified to speak from the standpoint of a lot of
doctors' degrees and that kind of education. I'm in law enforcement.
With crime profiling, I never felt we were qualified to use psychological
terms -- we have no business throwing diagnoses around.
Function terms
Instead of such ambiguous phrases, I decided to come up with functional
terms that described the crime's appearance: Organized, Disorganized
or Mixed. That appearance reflects directly on the offender.
- Organized. When I say a crime is organized, I generally mean it
was premeditated. Little evidence is found at the scene. The subject
carefully planned the crime to minimize risk and apprehension. Generally,
the organized criminal is the anti-social personality. Someone who
knows right from wrong. Someone who is not insane, who will show
no remorse over his criminal acts.
- Disorganized. In contrast, when I say disorganized, I'm referring
to a crime or crime scene that shows little, if any, pre-planning
on the part of the Unsub (unknown subject). The disorganized Unsub
has a high risk of being identified and apprehended. Evidentiary
items such as fingerprints, blood and semen are often found at the
scene. In cases of rape and homicide the Unsub often utilizes a
"blitz" style of attack that renders the victim unconscious
or dead. The disorganization of the crime may indicate any or all
of the following conditions: a youthful offender, the influence
of alcohol and/or drugs, difficulty controlling the victim or mental
illness.
- Mixed. When I say mixed classification, I mean a case such as that
of O.J. Simpson, where the crime scene appears to be very premeditated.
The subject brings to the scene the weapon, gloves and a hat --
premeditated. Yet the crime scene appears disorganized. The subject
had a well-planned idea but did not expect to be confronted, as
the subject was, in this case, by Ron Goldman. So he -- O.J. --
basically lost control over the situation so the crime's ultimate
appearance shifted from organized to disorganized.
When you look at some cases in the mixed category, you may be able
to pick up more than one offender at the scene. For example, one
part of the scene may appear to be very sophisticated and very organized,
while other parts are in total disarray. This may indicate that
two people participated in the act, operating in concert with one
another.
Sharpest possible portrait
The use of such straightforward descriptions suits the work well.
Criminal profiling, after all, is essentially a research function
conducted from a law enforcement perspective. The best terminology
is that which helps paint the sharpest possible portrait of the
Unsub.
The simple and easy process that I use in all my cases is applicable
in every crime of violence, including homicide, rape, child abduction,
arson, bombing, product tampering and extortion.
|